Top latest Five cases laws on sukuk bonds Urban news
Top latest Five cases laws on sukuk bonds Urban news
Blog Article
Online access to case information for payments in select juvenile and domestic relations district courts. Cases may very well be searched using name, case number, or hearing date.
Online access to civil and criminal cases in choose circuit courts. Cases could be searched by locality using name, case number, or hearing date.
four. It has been noticed by this Court that there can be a delay of one day inside the registration of FIR which has not been explained via the complainant. Moreover, there is not any eye-witness of the alleged incidence and the prosecution is relying on the witnesses of extra judicial confession. The evidence of extra judicial confession on the petitioners has long been tendered by Ghulam Dastigir and Mohammad Akram through their statements recorded under Section 161, Cr.P.C., on 06.02.2018. Both of them namely Ghulam Dastigir and Mohammad Akram took place to generally be the real brothers of your deceased but they didn't respond in any respect to your confessional statements of the petitioners and calmly noticed them leaving, a person after the other, without even moving an inch. They have not mentioned in their statements that the accused held some weapon when they visited them to confess their guilt about the murder of Ghulam Farid which could have precluded these witnesses from apprehending the petitioners. Their conduct does not search much inspiring or natural. The petitioner, namely, Mst. Mubeena Bibi was arrested on 14.02.2018 and there is no explanation as to why her arrest was not effected after making on the alleged extra judicial confession. It has been held on countless events that extra judicial confession of an accused can be a weak style of evidence which might be manoeuvred through the prosecution in any case where direct connecting evidence does not appear their way. The prosecution can be counting on the evidence of Murid Hussain and Muhammad Afzal which is equally fragile, as both the witnesses Murid Hussain and Muhammad Afzal did not say a word as to presence of some light on the place, where they allegedly saw the petitioners with each other on the motorcycle at 4.
Deterrence: The fear of severe repercussions, including capital punishment, is meant to deter possible criminals from committing murder. This deterrent effect is crucial in reducing the incidence of intentional killings.
prolonged period petitioner was not regarded for promotion, meeting of the departmental promotion committee and take into account the petitioner (Promotion)
This Court might interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer in a method inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the manner of inquiry or where the summary or finding attained because of the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. If your summary or finding is for example no reasonable person would have ever reached, the Court could interfere with the conclusion or perhaps the finding and mildew the relief to really make it suitable to the facts of every case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority could be the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-appreciate the evidence or the nature of punishment. Around the aforesaid proposition, we have been fortified because of the decision of your Supreme Court from the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Read more
only about the ground of miscases remanded & only around the ground of misreading of evidence only about the ground of misreading of evidence . disposed of(Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance, 1979)
already been released from the jail completion of his term . Appeal dismissed on merits (Murder Trial)
On June sixteen, 1999, a lawsuit was filed on behalf on the boy by a guardian ad litem, against DCFS, the social worker, and the therapist. A similar lawsuit was also filed on behalf with the Roe’s victimized son by a different guardian advert litem. The defendants petitioned the trial court for any dismissal based on absolute immunity, since they were all acting in their Careers with DCFS.
2. I have heard the realized counsel for that parties as well as learned DPG at length, perused the record and noticed that:-
The DCFS social worker in charge from the boy’s case had the boy made a ward of DCFS, and in her 6-month report towards the court, the worker elaborated about the boy’s sexual abuse history, and stated that she planned to maneuver him from a facility into a “more homelike setting.” The court approved more info her plan.
کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟
What's more, it addresses the limitation period under Article 91 and a hundred and twenty on the Limitation Act, focusing on when plaintiff to hunt cancellation. The importance of deciding application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC based solely on plaint averments in highlighted, excluding extrinsic material at this stage. Read more
competent authority has determined the eligibility of the private respondents and found them to generally be match for promotion. CP dismissed(Promotion)